'Poor Things' review: Unfortunately brilliant (2024)

Directed by Yorgos Lanthimos, Poor Things might be the best movie of the year. Please, for the love of God(win), do not watch it.

Let’s not mince words. I do not want you to watch Poor Things, I don’t care who you are. Yes, this is in spite of my assertion that this film is probably Yorgos Lanthimos’ best work yet — of course it wouldn’t be his previous film, The Favourite, then. Poor Things is sick. It’s deranged. It’s unkind and a blight upon the human condition and perhaps a direct insult toward Emma Stone’s agent. And no, this isn’t reverse psychology. Do not come to me saying you watched this film because I gave it a 9/10 and then complain about the outcome. This is not a film for people who want to sit back, relax, and unwind. Poor Things is very much, wholly anti-THAT. It’s also my Favourite.

If you do decide to watch this film and then write me off as a hack immediately after, just know that for my experience, I went into this knowing absolutely nothing about it except for the director, the lead talent, and the poster (of which I decidedly refused to inspect closely). I read nothing of Alasdair Gray’s eponymous 1992 novel of which Tony McNamara’s screenplay is based on, and for that matter, I have little clue what to even reveal about this film’s premise without angering the handful of you made of stern enough stuff to embrace this film’s unstoppable madness. Well, I have declared this a forbidden film, so I might as well fully commit and unpack it best I can.

'Poor Things' review: Unfortunately brilliant (1)

“She’s an experiment.”

Poor Things is about a young woman finding personal liberation in a world ripped from BioShock Infinite‘s “Columbia” mixed with the dreadful body horror of BioShock‘s “Rapture,” but if David Cronenberg had directed both. For those of you outside of video game circles, the basic construct is a cursed blend of Frankenstein, The Odyssey, and (I can’t believe I’m saying this) Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Sex* (*But Were Afraid to Ask). Like I said, cursed.

Emma Stone plays Bella Baxter, at first an infantile woman who acts erratically and nonsensically under the care of a deformed scientist she refers to as God/Godwin, portrayed by Willem Dafoe in easily his most sublime performance since Tommaso. Despite her eccentricities and perhaps because of her off-putting child-like demeanor, she attracts the attention of competing suitors, one of whom is an adventurous cad of a lawyer played by Mark Ruffalo, who whisks Bella away on a sexual journey in more ways than one.

Lanthimos’ style of filmmaking has always contained multitudes. There’s the side of the Greek director who can’t seem to decide for himself why people are the way they are. Or rather, why movies constantly put a glamor filter to the awkward, disgusting, and readily apparent nature of human beings. Maybe because movies are supposed to be an escape? Well the other side of Lanthimos is where that escape comes in. Through works like Killing of a Sacred Deer, The Lobster, and more, Lanthimos imagines fantasy worlds where the rules are arbitrary, but the effects they have on society are all too real. It’s escape through realism, basically, and it’s what makes him the type of director cinephiles all over the world love to claim they understand. Guilty as charged.

“It is the goal of all to progress, grow.”

With Poor Things, he’s entered another realm of mystical monstrosities and exaggerated aesthetic without quite compromising his theoretical worldview, that the world is more interesting when we put words and images to the uncomfortable. The bizarre side effect is that this only makes Stone’s Bella all the more thrilling of a character when she inevitably comes into her own liberation. If she was a fireball of a performer in The Favourite, then Poor Things is her wildfire of femininity and feminism.

'Poor Things' review: Unfortunately brilliant (2)

“A woman plotting her course to freedom.”

What Stone manages to pull off in Poor Things is the stuff of legends. The performance looks, sounds, and feels impossible, yet it’s also…life-affirming? It’s by far her best performance thus far and then some, where even the obvious criticisms somehow work in her favor. Like how at times this heightened imaginarium world tends to get away from Lanthimos, particularly when he decides to employ some of his more tired and perfunctory lens tricks that remind of how J.J. Abrams just couldn’t give up the ghost on that flare aesthetic for as long as he did. Whatever, at least Lanthimos uses it sparingly, since clearly it works for other people.

Anyway, 2023 might’ve been the year of Barbie, but in actuality, Poor Things is the macabre madhouse this year was made for. It’s just a shame the vast majority of the population can not, will not, and should not watch it. Assuming they can wrest the DVD away from me to get a glimpse at this poor, unfortunate soul.

Poor Things is now playing select theaters. Watch the trailer here.

Images courtesy of Searchlight Pictures. Read more articles by Jon Negronihere.

REVIEW RATING
  • Poor Things - 9/10

    9/10

Related

'Poor Things' review: Unfortunately brilliant (2024)

FAQs

What is the controversy with poor little things? ›

Poor Things is ableist because of its use of prosthetics to simulate facial differences and its explicit comparison of Bella Baxter, who has a baby's brain and an adult's body, to people with intellectual disabilities. Many other disabled people, including Erica Mones and Andrew Gurza, also criticized its ableism.

Why is Poor Things controversial explained? ›

There have also been accusations that the nudity is exploitative and that, because Bella has the brain of a child, there are consent issues at play. “If it helps, as the person who played it and produced it, I didn't see her as a child in any of those scenes,” Stone told The Times when these criticisms were raised.

What is the moral of the story of Poor Things? ›

Poor Things is a film about innocence, about discovery, about human nature. It makes us question the way we view things, the way we censor behaviour, the way we impose societal norms upon each other, and how seeing those norms disregarded can be both disturbing and exhilarating.

What is the message behind the Poor Things? ›

The film explores themes of personal transformation and breaking free from societal constraints. Close-up shots capture Stone's expressive eyes and facial expressions, revealing her ability to access a deeper sense of humanity.

Why was Poor Things so bad? ›

almost everything else didn't work for me. So much nudity, so much unnecessary nudity that didn't elevate the story in any way, and most of the film, I was just uncomfortable, I did not want to be there, and that lowered down the rating by a lot.

Why do critics like Poor Things? ›

The best film of 2023. A Frankenstein Meets Forrest Gump flick filtered through a feminist focus. Discover 'Poor Things': A unique blend of bizarre ideas and imaginative storytelling, delivering an entertaining film with top-notch acting and production. A twisted, darkly funny coming-of-age dramedy.

How inappropriate is Poor Things? ›

Expect many scenes with full-frontal and partial nudity and lots of fairly graphic sex—between couples, friends, and sex workers and their customers. Much of the movie's violence is medical, but that includes several gory, unsettling scenes of cadavers being dissected and (in Bella's case) stabbed for fun.

Is Poor Things misogynistic? ›

The Oscar nominated film, starring Emma Stone as a reanimated corpse indulging in sex and socialism, has been accused of misogyny due to its graphic nudity and polarising gender politics. But this is a film as much about male insecurity as it is female empowerment, argues Xan Brooks.

Is Poor Things worth reading? ›

Poor Things might just be a monster of a book itself. A found object, a book within a book, a story within a story - there are just so many layers to this book. Despite its pastiche-like premise and topsy-turvy turns, it is a brilliantly written piece of metafiction.

Is Poor Things based on a true story? ›

PSA: Poor Things is not a true story.

What does the ending of Poor Things mean? ›

Bella ends up living happily at Godwin's estate and swapping Alfie's brain with a goat. Bella's choice to leave Max at the altar for Alfie hints at her curiosity and desire for truth. Duncan reunites Bella and Alfie out of spite and control, but she eventually breaks free.

What is Poor Things summary? ›

How many Oscars did Poor Things win? ›

It was also nominated for thirteen Critics' Choice Awards (including Best Picture), with Stone winning for Best Actress, eleven BAFTA Awards (including Best Film), winning for five awards, including Best Actress in a Leading Role for Stone, and eleven Academy Awards, winning for four awards.

What happened to Godwin's face in Poor Things? ›

The experiments Godwin's own father practiced on him in his youth have left him disfigured with bodily functions that don't quite work as they should. Yet, Godwin is tender and paternal in his treatment of Bella as her mind rapidly matures.

Is Poor Things immoral? ›

Thus, scene for scene, POOR THINGS stands as one of the most obscene major motion pictures released by Hollywood that MOVIEGUIDE® has covered. POOR THINGS is also one of the most abhorrent, disgusting, immoral, inane movies ever made.

Is Poor Things book based on a true story? ›

PSA: Poor Things is not a true story.

What is Bella's mental age in Poor Things? ›

Godwin Baxter's (Willem Dafoe) latest experiment is reanimating a woman's corpse by using an infant brain for a brand-new person he's coined Bella (Stone). While Bella mentally develops from ages 2 to 20 with the body of a 30-year-old at rapid speed, she catches the attention of four different men.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Gov. Deandrea McKenzie

Last Updated:

Views: 6456

Rating: 4.6 / 5 (46 voted)

Reviews: 93% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Gov. Deandrea McKenzie

Birthday: 2001-01-17

Address: Suite 769 2454 Marsha Coves, Debbieton, MS 95002

Phone: +813077629322

Job: Real-Estate Executive

Hobby: Archery, Metal detecting, Kitesurfing, Genealogy, Kitesurfing, Calligraphy, Roller skating

Introduction: My name is Gov. Deandrea McKenzie, I am a spotless, clean, glamorous, sparkling, adventurous, nice, brainy person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.